They left the matter (as I understand their statement) Wholly to Sir John Davis. If they did so, no doubt their reliance on the scheme was very great, and I think it is quite clear that their successor cannot now be permitted to abandon it.
On the question at issue, what the former Government had promised appears to have been that the Total amount had fulfilled what they considered to be their original intention. There was a neglect to make at the proper time a full disclosure.
I could see no end to similar claims, if they were permitted to be closed at one time, and reopened at another time, as suited the exigencies. (I am assuming the facts as stated) I therefore concur with the Judges as to the inexpediency of these claims, and that the people of the Colony must now be guided by the Ordinance.
I agree with you farther. Stating this for the reason given by yourself, an independent
Three
They left the matter (as
I underland their sucupon
to state) Whistly to Sir).
Davis. If they did 10
}
their reliance on the schemale
use no doult very his flared,
hed I think it in quite
not
their secupor cannot
now be permitted to the
tem.
brith
6. the question at
what
What the former
+
Her famil
Prestres
abandoned it has smoke?
^
I no End All faches
appear at that time to have
her sabiped that the Toral
fort had pulfitted what une comsidued to hit anginch intention. There
+ n
peglected to make at the proper time.
212
could to no end to similar claim, if they were permitted
po I laid mida at one tim
&repped at another wanted as closed at one firm, and respened at another trait
the Amy
in commquence of unestucked exigenies Laniz
occured.
(a is I Lan countly assumed stated the facts)
I theref
apu
with
comiding
ufacty
thes clasin
of
the Juntes as in a
inastiheith,
and that the pheope of die 18.
must now
2
rauld as
sahiped by the Adinance.
و
agne
with
8m farther.
Sinting Set for the
nason firin by jouself,
Eun independrell 1
Thre
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.